ACM Partnership, Southampton-Hamilton Company, Tax Matters Partner - Page 75

                                       - 33 -                                         
          available in the market at that time.  ABN was loath to accept              
          any spread risk for Kannex.  On the advice of its tax lawyers,              
          Colgate insisted, and the parties finally agreed, on a sharing              
          formula that limited Kannex's exposure to 7-1/2 basis points                
          (15 percent of a 50 basis point range).                                     
               The parties agreed on one further special allocation under             
          the Partnership Agreement.  From the date of the initial capital            
          contributions through February 28, 1992, the first $1,241,000 of            
          partnership income and gain for each fiscal year otherwise                  
          allocable to Southampton would be allocated to Kannex.  This                
          preferred return was not cumulative and was prorated daily.  For            
          this purpose, gains otherwise allocable to Southampton did not              
          include unrealized gains resulting from revaluations of                     
          partnership assets.  ABN had insisted on a preferred return as              
          compensation to Kannex for participating in the spread risk of              
          the Colgate debt.  ABN intended that the amount would also                  
          include a small service fee for the adjustments that the bank               
          would have to make to accommodate Southampton's discretionary               
          management of interest rate exposure under the Yield Component              
          provision.  As the price for these benefits and as a substitute             
          for the covenants and other legal protections that a lender in              
          the position of Kannex would require as a condition for investing           
          a great deal of money in Colgate debt obligations, Colgate                  
          considered the $1.24 million preferred return to be reasonable.             






Page:  Previous  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011