- 63 - transactions with Merrill believed that they offered "very attractive", "extremely favorable" terms. According to calculations performed by petitioner's expert Tanya Beder (Beder),16 the transactions effectively provided both banks with funding at a cost 39 basis points lower than that available in the direct interbank market. The 39 basis points in savings represents each bank's net present value gain from the structured transaction expressed in relation to the amount of the financing involved. Beder's valuation analysis is useful for identifying how the banks expected to gain overall while losing money on both the basis and hedge swaps. Valuation of the Positions of BOT and BFCE as of 11/27/89 ( $ millions = mm ) BOT BFCE LIBOR Notes Price rec'd from ACM $24.58 mm $9.83 mm Mid-market value (24.05)mm (9.61)mm Citicorp Notes Price paid to ACM (124.58)mm (49.83)mm PV of expected sale proceeds rec'd by banks 125.39 mm 50.15 mm Hedge Swap Liability leg (24.88)mm (9.77)mm Asset leg 24.08 mm 9.62 mm Basis Swap Asset leg 18.77 mm 7.43 mm Liability leg (18.22)mm (7.29)mm Merrill's cancellation option (0.89)mm (0.29)mm 16 Beder is affiliated with the New York consulting firm of Capital Market Risk Advisors, and serves on the faculty of the Yale School of Management.Page: Previous 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011