ACM Partnership, Southampton-Hamilton Company, Tax Matters Partner - Page 127

                                       - 85 -                                         
          substantially and inappropriately defer recovery of basis," the             
          taxpayer may request an alternate method, but the Commissioner is           
          not granted explicit authority by the temporary regulations to              
          require the use of an alternate method in that situation.                   
          Sec. 15a.453-1(c)(7)(ii), Temporary Income Tax Regs., 46 Fed.               
          Reg. 10716.  The Commissioner may prescribe an alternate method             
          if she determines that the taxpayer's method of accounting with             
          respect to the sale does not "clearly reflect income".  Sec.                
          446(b).  In general, the Commissioner has broad discretion to               
          determine whether an accounting method clearly reflects income.             
          See Thor Power Tool Co. v. Commissioner, 439 U.S. 522, 532-533              
          (1979); Commissioner v. Hansen, 360 U.S. 446, 467 (1959); Ferrill           
          v. Commissioner, 684 F.2d. 261, 264 (3d Cir. 1982), affg. T.C.              
          Memo. 1979-501; Hudson v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1996-106.  A             
          taxpayer's method of accounting does not clearly reflect income             
          when it does not represent "economic reality".  See Prabel v.               
          Commissioner, 882 F.2d 820, 826-827 (3d Cir. 1989), affg. 91 T.C.           
          1101 (1988).  In this case, the Commissioner has not exercised              
          her discretion by raising the clear reflection of income issue in           
          her pleadings or in her brief.                                              
          2.  Economic Substance                                                      
               a.  Introduction                                                       
               In his opening statement, petitioner's counsel aptly                   
          characterized the role of economic substance in this case:                  






Page:  Previous  75  76  77  78  79  80  81  82  83  84  85  86  87  88  89  90  91  92  93  94  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011