ACM Partnership, Southampton-Hamilton Company, Tax Matters Partner - Page 134

                                       - 92 -                                         
          Goldstein's indebtedness was enforceable with full recourse and             
          her investments were exposed to market risk.  Yet, the strategy             
          was not consistent with rational economic behavior in the absence           
          of the expected tax benefits.  Other courts have applied the                
          teaching of Goldstein in varied settings.  In Sheldon v.                    
          Commissioner, 94 T.C. 738 (1990), for example, this Court                   
          analyzed the financial transactions in issue there in a manner              
          similar to that employed in Goldstein.  The Court first                     
          determined that the transactions at issue were real, rather than            
          fictitious.  The Court then evaluated economic substance, stating           
          that "the principle of * * * [Goldstein] would not, as                      
          petitioners suggest, permit deductions merely because a taxpayer            
          had or experienced some de minimis gain."  Id. at 767.  The Court           
          held that a transaction resulting in gain that was                          
          "infinitesimally nominal and vastly insignificant when considered           

               21(...continued)                                                       
          fictitious.  In Rice's Toyota World, Inc. v. Commissioner,                  
          752 F.2d 89 (4th Cir. 1985), affg. in part and revg. in part                
          81 T.C. 184 (1983), the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit             
          concluded that a transaction was a sham because it lacked                   
          business purpose and economic substance.  In Lerman v.                      
          Commissioner, 939 F.2d 44, 53-54 (3d Cir. 1991), affg. Fox v.               
          Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1988-570, the Court of Appeals for the             
          Third Circuit adopted the Second Circuit's definition of a sham             
          transaction as "a transaction that 'is fictitious or * * * has no           
          business purpose or economic effect other than the creation of              
          tax deductions.'"  (quoting DeMartino v. Commissioner, 862 F.2d             
          400, 406 (2d Cir. 1988), affg. 88 T.C. 583 (1987)).  The CINS               
          transaction was not a sham in the sense that it was fictitious              
          but it was a sham in the sense that the sec. 453 investment                 
          strategy lacked economic substance.                                         






Page:  Previous  82  83  84  85  86  87  88  89  90  91  92  93  94  95  96  97  98  99  100  101  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011