- 96 - Revenue Act of 1928 (1928 Act), ch. 852, 45 Stat. 831,35 a provi- sion that was substantially the same as section 1502. When Congress was considering a revision of the revenue law that ultimately became the 1928 Act it became aware of a broad range of problems and potential abuses that had emerged in the adminis- tration and interpretation of the consolidated return provisions. Many of those problems and potential abuses were set forth in the Staff of Joint Committee, Report of the Joint Committee on Internal Revenue Taxation (Vol. I), 63-66 (1928) (Joint Committee report). The Joint Committee report recommended that the consol- idated return provisions be abolished and replaced with provi- sions permitting the operating loss of any member of an affili- ated group, as defined in the Joint Committee report proposal, to be offset against the net income of one or more members of that 34 (...continued) or distraint or proceeding in court begun, in respect of the tax for a consolidated return period, shall be applica- ble * * * (2) to each corporation the income of which was included in the consolidated return, or which filed Form 1122, for such period, even though it is subsequently determined that such corporation was not a member of the group. 35 Sec. 141(b) of the Revenue Act of 1928 (1928 Act), ch. 852, 45 Stat. 831, provided: Regulations.--The Commissioner, with the approval of the Secretary, shall prescribe such regulations as he may deem necessary in order that the tax liability of an affil- iated group of corporations making a consolidated return and of each corporation in the group, both during and after the period of affiliation, may be determined, computed, assessed, collected, and adjusted in such manner as clearly to reflect the income and to prevent avoidance of tax liability.Page: Previous 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011