BankAmerica Corporation, as successor in interest to Continental Bank Corporation, as successor in interest to Continental Illinois Corporation - Page 20

                                       - 20 -                                         
               We conclude that, in the interest of justice, petitioner               
          should be relieved from the effects of the stipulated 1994                  
          computations for the narrow purpose of redetermining interest for           
          the 1978 and 1977 tax years during the interim period at issue.             
          Cf. Rule 91(e); Louisiana Land and Exploration Co. v.                       
          Commissioner, 90 T.C. 630, 648 (1988); Korangy v. Commissioner,             
          893 F.2d 69, 72 (4th Cir. 1990), affg. T.C. Memo. 1989-2                    
          (applying Rule 91(e) to a settlement agreement).                            
               In this context, we find it irrelevant whether the error as            
          to the carryback of the 1979 ITC was due to the carelessness of             
          either party, in this case, the failure of petitioner to protect            
          its interest by pointing out to respondent at the time the 1994             
          computations were constructed that the amounts of the 1979 ITC              
          had been omitted.  As we stated in Woods v. Commissioner, 92 T.C.           
          776, 789 (1989):                                                            
               The circumstances of this case do not warrant                          
               withholding relief from a mistake.  The mere fact that                 
               the party seeking relief did not exercise reasonable                   
               care does not preclude reformation.  1 Restatement,                    
               Contracts 2d, sec. 155, comment a; sec. 157, p. 416.                   
                    Reformation provides a result that both parties                   
               agreed to and prevents an unintended and unexpected                    
               windfall. * * *                                                        

               We now turn to the proper computation of interest, for                 
          purposes of determining whether or not petitioner has actually              








Page:  Previous  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011