- 26 -                                         
          underlying principle of section 6601(d) should not apply.                   
          Manning v. Seeley Tube & Box Co., 338 U.S. at 566.  Neither party           
          contends that such an exception applies to the facts of this                
          case.18                                                                     
               The second exception occurs when the later event relates               
          back to the beginning of the interest period, in which case                 
          interest is calculated from the beginning taking the change into            
          account.  This exception can be illustrated by General Dynamics             
          Corp. v. United States, 214 Ct. Cl. 369, 562 F.2d 1201 (1977),              
          which respondent cites in support of the argument that interest             
          on petitioner's deficiency not be reduced by the amounts of ITC             
          used between 1979 and 1983.  In that case, the taxpayer                     
          18  But see Fluor Corp. v. United States, 35 Fed. Cl. 520                   
          (1996), which holds that sec. 6601(d) does not apply to FTC's and           
          abated interest on a deficiency eliminated by the carryback of an           
          FTC.  FTC carryovers "shall be deemed taxes paid or accrued" in             
          the years to which they are carried back or forward.  Sec.                  
          904(c).  Sec. 6611(g) provides that, notwithstanding the                    
          provisions of sec. 904(c), interest on an overpayment                       
          attributable to an FTC accrues, not from the date "deemed" paid,            
          but from the date the taxes were actually paid.  Significantly,             
          however, sec. 6601(d) with regard to underpayments lacks any                
          analogous provision as to the treatment of FTC's.  The court in             
          Fluor interpreted this silence as the "clear legislative                    
          expression" required by Manning v. Seeley Tube & Box Co., 338               
          U.S. 561, 566 (1950), to suspend the otherwise general "use of              
          money" principle, and not charge the taxpayer interest on the               
          deficiency eliminated by the carryback of the FTC.  While we                
          recognize that there is a lack of statutory clarity in the                  
          interplay between secs. 904, 6601, and 6611, we are not                     
          confronted herein with comparable lack of clarity which would               
          cause us to characterize such lack of clarity as a "clear                   
          legislative expression" for purposes of Manning v. Seeley Tube &            
          Box Co., supra.                                                             
Page:  Previous   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   NextLast modified: May 25, 2011