Sharon Lee Bartlett, F.K.A. Heitzman - Page 31

                                       - 31 -                                         

          80 T.C. 914, 941 (1983)).  The record in the case at hand is                
          replete with similar indicia of indifference to profits on the              
          part of Stonehurst and its principals.                                      
               Petitioner’s expert, Charles M. Bowers (Bowers), a petroleum           
          engineer registered in Oklahoma, concluded that the Coburn report           
          was egregiously flawed in several ways.  In Bowers’ view, the               
          most egregious flaw in the Coburn report was the assertion that             
          “commercial oil production can be obtained from the Bartlesville            
          Sand”.  Because of the unique characteristics of Bartlesville               
          Sand,11 there would have had to have been previous oil production           
          in commercial quantities on the lease in order for the Coburn               
          report to make such an assertion without its being a gross                  
          misrepresentation.  The Coburn report referred to no evidence to            
          support its contentions about the likelihood of discovering oil             
          in commercial quantities.  Furthermore, Mr. Heitzman testified at           
          trial that the maps he was shown indicated that the closest                 
          proven Bartlesville Sand was 8 miles from the leasehold.12                  
               Another egregious flaw in the Coburn report was its claim of           
          a 90-percent success rate for exploratory drilling.  Likelihoods            
          of success on the order of 90 percent are associated with                   
          developmental drilling, which the Memorandum itself defined as              

               11 See supra n.7.                                                      
               12 Now repealed sec. 56(h)(6)(B), providing energy based               
          preference adjustments to the alternative minimum tax, defined              
          the minimum distance of an exploratory well from other wells as             
          1.25 miles or 800 feet in depth (the exploratory well being                 
          deeper).                                                                    


Page:  Previous  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011