- 16 - automobiles; (3) petitioner provided Mr. Harley with certificates of title to four of the automobiles; (4) Mr. Harley was acting at the express direction of petitioner when he wired the $3 million in sale proceeds to the Julius Baer account at Banker's Trust in New York; (5) approximately 10 days after the sale proceeds were deposited into the Julius Baer account at Banker's Trust, $453,375 was wired from this account to the Indian Head Bank in Portsmouth, New Hampshire, in satisfaction of an outstanding mortgage on property owned by petitioner; (6) approximately 2 months later, petitioner provided his wife with $2.5 million in satisfaction of his divorce settlement obligation; and (7) in connection with the divorce, petitioner had included the automobiles in question on a three-page list that he compiled of the couple's marital assets. The principal issue for decision is whether petitioner owned the automobiles in issue and, therefore, realized gain on their sale on or about July 8, 1988. Petitioner argues that he sold the automobiles on behalf of the late Abdul Aziz Ben-Jabr, and then borrowed a total of $2,953,000 from the Ben-Jabr family to satisfy an outstanding $453,375 mortgage on property he owned in Maine, as well as a $2.5 million divorce settlement obligation. Respondent, on the other hand, contends that petitioner was the owner of the five automobiles in question and used almost all the sale proceeds to satisfy the above obligations.Page: Previous 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011