- 19 - discussions with petitioner regarding the sale of these automobiles, Mr. Gates explained as follows: I was asking about the mechanics of the transaction, where did it go and how did it have to go, and I was told [by petitioner] that the cars were delivered and the transaction took place outside the United States. My obvious question is why does it need to be that confusing, why does it have to be that complicated. * * * Q: What did Mr. Bennett say? A: He said he did not want to--he wanted to avoid paying the taxes. He didn't want to pay any more money to the IRS than he had to pay. * * * Q: Did he[petitioner] say anything with respect to the money vis-a-vis overseas banks? A: I recall the conversation about the transaction taking place outside of the country and the cars being delivered outside of the country and everything was done outside of the country. Q: Including the money. A: Including the money. Q: And the money was taken care of outside the United States, according to Dr. Bennett, for what purpose? A: So that he would not have to pay IRS any more taxes than he had to pay them. Clearly, any potential income tax consequences from the sale of the automobiles should have been irrelevant to petitioner if he was not the owner of the automobiles. Petitioner's story that he purchased the five automobiles in question for his good friend Abdul Aziz Ben-Jabr is also inconsistent with the fact that three of the automobiles werePage: Previous 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011