- 13 - benefit to the dealerships. The Government further contends that the dealerships are not in the insurance business and should not be allowed to deduct insurance expenses. First, the Government is mistaken in treating the dealerships and the dealer-related agencies as separate, autonomous organizations. As we indicated earlier, the dealerships provide the service of offering, explaining, and calculating credit insurance. The agencies have no employees and are merely shadow entities; they do not in fact sell insurance. The agencies receive the commissions on the premiums, but that result is required by Michigan law. To be sure, Michigan law governs as to the rights created and the relationships involved, but Federal law is determinative as to tax consequences. Morgan v. Commissioner, 309 U.S. 78, 80-81 (1940). See United States v. National Bank of Commerce, 472 U.S. 713, 722 (1985); United States v. Mitchell, 403 U.S. 190, 197 (1971); Bank One Ohio Trust Co., N.A. v. United States, 80 F.3d 173, 175 (6th Cir. 1996); Estate of Agnello v. Commissioner, 103 T.C. 605, 614 (1994). Second, the Government contends that the dealerships should be denied the deductions because they are not in the insurance business. The Government fails to recognize the dealerships' role in fact in the sale of credit insurance and in that connection the breadth of a dealership's business. A motor vehicle dealership does much more than merely sell vehicles. Among other things, it arranges for financing of installmentPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011