- 16 - We agree with respondent that petitioner is liable for a penalty under section 6673(a)(1), and we require him to pay a penalty to the United States in the amount of $5,000. Petitioner's conduct throughout this proceeding has convinced us that he instituted and maintained this proceeding primarily for delay. His position in this proceeding also is groundless and frivolous. See Coleman v. Commissioner, 791 F.2d 68, 71 (7th Cir. 1986); see also Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319 (1989) (defining legal frivolousness). Petitioner's insistence on pursuing his fruitless arguments has consumed time and effort of this Court (and of respondent) that could have otherwise been devoted to resolving bona fide claims of other taxpayers. See Cook v. Spillman, 806 F.2d 948 (9th Cir. 1986). We have considered all arguments made by petitioner in this proceeding and, to the extent not discussed above, find them to be irrelevant or without merit. To reflect the foregoing, An appropriate order and decision will be entered for respondent except for the addition to tax under section 6654.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Last modified: May 25, 2011