Catherine Chimblo and Estate of Gus Chimblo, Deceased, Catherine Chimblo, Executrix - Page 6

                                                 - 6 -                                                   
            opportunity to participate in the partnership level proceeding.                              
            Crowell v. Commissioner, 102 T.C. 683, 691 (1994).                                           
                  Section 6223(a) generally provides that respondent shall                               
            mail to each partner notice of the beginning of an administrative                            
            proceeding at the partnership level with respect to a partnership                            
            item, as well as notice of the final partnership administrative                              
            adjustment (FPAA) resulting from any such proceeding.  It is the                             
            mailing of the FPAA that triggers the time period for a partner                              
            to object to the partnership level adjustments by filing a                                   
            petition for readjustment.  Sec. 6226(a).  Failure by respondent                             
            to provide notice of a partnership level proceeding to a partner                             
            may result in that partner's share of the partnership items being                            
            treated as nonpartnership items.  Secs. 6223(e)(2),                                          
            6231(b)(1)(D).  In light of petitioners' arguments, respondent                               
            must be prepared to demonstrate compliance with the section                                  
            6223(a) notice requirements.  Crowell v. Commissioner, supra at                              
            691-692.                                                                                     
                  At trial, Josephine did not recall receiving an FPAA with                              
            respect to the Barrister partnership proceeding.  Catherine did                              
            not testify as to whether or not she received one.  However, the                             
            validity of a properly mailed FPAA is not contingent upon actual                             
            receipt by the partner of the FPAA.  Id. at 692.                                             
                  Respondent submitted certified records that show that FPAAs                            
            for the Barrister partnership for 1983 and 1984 were mailed to                               
            petitioners on September 5, 1989.  We are convinced by evidence                              




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011