- 6 - Evelyn Cooper. Petitioner admitted that this travel was not related to his work for Con Tex, Inc. In addition, a ticket for travel in February 1987 submitted by petitioner does not relate to petitioner's work for Con Tex, Inc., since he did not even begin such work until July 1987. Therefore, petitioner's records were not precise, as he maintains, and are not reliable. Furthermore, despite petitioner's mischaracterized meticulous record keeping, the various summaries he prepared from his records each set forth a different amount of his alleged expenses. For example, a spreadsheet allegedly prepared by petitioner to assist his return preparer with the preparation of petitioners' 1987 tax return purports to show that petitioner incurred expenses of $37,382 relating to his work with Con Tex, Inc. (this summary also purports to show that petitioner was reimbursed $31,992 for such expenses). By contrast, a summary of expenses prepared by petitioner, and presented to the examining agent in this case, states that petitioner incurred business expenses totaling $43,579 relating to his work with Con Tex, Inc., during the 1987 tax year. A third summary purporting to show the expenses incurred by petitioner, and which allegedly takes into account amounts set forth on documents included within several exhibits prepared byPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011