- 4 - that she would not claim dependency exemption deductions for Michael and Robert on her 1994 Federal income tax return. In the notice of deficiency respondent disallowed the dependency exemption deductions claimed for Michael and Robert explaining that petitioner failed to establish that he provided more than one half of their total support. Discussion Respondent argues that her adjustments should be sustained because petitioner, as the noncustodial parent of Michael and Robert, is precluded from claiming dependency exemption deductions for those children pursuant to section 152(e)(1), which states: (1) Custodial parent gets exemption. Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, if-- (A) a child (as defined in section 151(c)(3))receives over half of his support during the calendar year from his parents-- (i) who are divorced or legally separated under a decree of divorce or separate maintenance, (ii) who are separated under a written separation agreement, or (iii) who live apart at all times during the last 6 months of the calendar year, and (B) such child is in the custody of one or both of his parents for more than one-half of the calendar year, such child shall be treated, for purposes of section (a), as receiving over half of his support during thePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011