Michael G. Correale - Page 5

                                                 - 5 -                                                   

                  calendar year from the parent having custody for a                                     
                  greater portion of the calendar year (hereinafter                                      
                  referred to as the "custodial parent").                                                
            Petitioner argues that he was not legally separated as of the                                
            close of 1994 and therefore section 152(e)(1) does not apply.                                
            According to petitioner he has satisfied the provisions of                                   
            sections 151(c) and 152(a) and is entitled to dependency                                     
            exemption deductions for Michael and Robert.  Respondent                                     
            apparently agrees that, but for the application of section                                   
            152(e)(1), petitioner is entitled to the deductions here in                                  
            dispute.                                                                                     
                  As of the close of 1994, petitioner and Mrs. Correale                                  
            (1) were not divorced, (2) were not separated under a written                                
            separation agreement, and (3) had not lived apart at all times                               
            during the last 6 months of the year.  Consequently, the                                     
            application of section 152(e)(1) depends upon whether as of the                              
            close of 1994 petitioner and Mrs. Correale were legally separated                            
            under a decree of separate maintenance.  In turn, this                                       
            determination depends upon whether the interim order constitutes                             
            a decree of separate maintenance that rendered petitioner legally                            
            separated within the meaning of section 152(e)(1)(A)(i).                                     
            Respondent argues that it does; petitioner disagrees.  For the                               
            following reasons, we agree with petitioner.                                                 
                  Petitioner's marital status as of the close of 1994 is                                 
            determined by Illinois law.  Deyoe v. Commissioner, 66 T.C. 904,                             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011