- 4 - FINDINGS OF FACT Bank Fees Petitioners failed to include $45 of interest income, earned from their bank account, on their 1991 income tax return. There was no evidence presented as to whether the bank account was personal or business. At the time of filing of their return, petitioners reasoned that because they incurred $48 of bank fees in obtaining such interest, they could net the two and exclude the income and not claim the deduction. Petitioners conceded that the interest was properly includable in income for the 1991 tax year, but claim that they are entitled to a $48 deduction as an ordinary and necessary trade or business expense for the 1991 taxable year. Unreported Income During 1991, petitioner purchased from Doug Priester insurance policies on himself, his wife, and his children. Doug Priester issued a Form 1099 to the Internal Revenue Service and (allegedly) to petitioners, indicating that petitioners had received $3,577 as gross income in the form of a discount on insurance sold to them. Respondent determined in the notice of deficiency that petitioners failed to report the $3,577 in gross income for the 1991 tax year. Petitioner argues that he did not receive a copy of Form 1099, that he was not in the position to have performed services for Doug Priester for which payments may have been made, and that he received no money from Doug Priester.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011