- 5 - While he denies that he received a $3,577 discount, he acknowledges that he may have received a discount, but he does not know the size of it. Petitioner did not put into evidence the insurance policies, evidence as to his basis in such policies, the cost, or the fair market value of such policies. Commission Expense Respondent determined that petitioners overstated the commission expense shown on Schedule C of their 1989 Federal income tax return by $403. Petitioner testified that he presented respondent with substantiation of the $403 deduction. No such substantiation was introduced into evidence at trial. Advance Commissions Petitioner was an insurance sales agent for American Service Underwriters, Inc. (American), for the years 1988 through 1991. Petitioner was paid advance insurance sales commissions in the amounts of $93,413, $17,839.79, $51,161, and $42,529 for the 1988, 1989, 1990, and 1991 tax years, respectively. Under petitioner's contract with American, he would receive a monthly draw against his future commission income. Petitioner signed a note, dated July 14, 1986, which made him personally liable on the advance commissions, payable on demand. Regarding such personal liability, the contract with American provided: 7. INDEBTEDNESS: Any and all indebtedness of any kind or nature owed by [petitioner] to [American] shall be and serve as a first lien on any commissions due or to become due said [petitioner]. [American has] the right and may at any time elect to withhold or offsetPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011