- 10 - properly prosecute as to those issues on which petitioner bears the burden of proof. At the conclusion of trial, respondent filed a written motion to dismiss for petitioner's failure to properly prosecute. The Court took the motion under advisement. Since respondent bears the burden of proof with respect to the additions to tax for fraud, the increased deficiencies, and the additions to tax claimed in her amended answer, the case proceeded to trial wherein respondent presented her case. FINDINGS OF FACT Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found.6 The stipulation of facts and attached exhibits are incorporated herein by this reference. At the time of filing the petition herein, petitioner resided in Columbus, Ohio. 1. General Background During the years at issue, petitioner was self-employed in various businesses relating to the development of residential real estate. Petitioner has a bachelor of science degree from Miami University, with a major in accounting, and a master of business administration degree from Ohio State University, with a major in finance. Petitioner has also completed a major portion 6 A stipulation of facts was filed by the parties containing almost 500 paragraphs and hundreds of attached exhibits. The Court also deemed certain facts and evidence stipulated pursuant to Rule 91(f). Also, petitioner was sanctioned for failure to comply with discovery, in that he was prevented from presenting evidence of certain matters. In any event, petitioner did not appear nor offer any evidence at trial.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011