Albert J. and Helen R. Desantis - Page 10

                                       - 10 -                                         

          properly prosecute as to those issues on which petitioner bears             
          the burden of proof.  At the conclusion of trial, respondent                
          filed a written motion to dismiss for petitioner's failure to               
          properly prosecute.  The Court took the motion under advisement.            
          Since respondent bears the burden of proof with respect to the              
          additions to tax for fraud, the increased deficiencies, and the             
          additions to tax claimed in her amended answer, the case                    
          proceeded to trial wherein respondent presented her case.                   
                                  FINDINGS OF FACT                                    
               Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found.6              
          The stipulation of facts and attached exhibits are incorporated             
          herein by this reference.  At the time of filing the petition               
          herein, petitioner resided in Columbus, Ohio.                               
          1.   General Background                                                     
               During the years at issue, petitioner was self-employed in             
          various businesses relating to the development of residential               
          real estate.  Petitioner has a bachelor of science degree from              
          Miami University, with a major in accounting, and a master of               
          business administration degree from Ohio State University, with a           
          major in finance.  Petitioner has also completed a major portion            

          6  A stipulation of facts was filed by the parties                          
          containing almost 500 paragraphs and hundreds of attached                   
          exhibits.  The Court also deemed certain facts and evidence                 
          stipulated pursuant to Rule 91(f).  Also, petitioner was                    
          sanctioned for failure to comply with discovery, in that he was             
          prevented from presenting evidence of certain matters.  In any              
          event, petitioner did not appear nor offer any evidence at trial.           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011