Dharma Enterprises - Page 38

                                       - 38 -                                         

          v. Commissioner, 90 T.C. 110, 115 (1988).  Petitioner argues that           
          respondent must specify the year in which the NOL’s that produced           
          the disallowed carryover deduction arose and the reasons                    
          respondent disallowed the NOL’s in that year.  We disagree.  The            
          notice of deficiency in this case identifies the years in which             
          the NOL deductions were disallowed and the amount of the                    
          disallowed NOL deductions.  See sec. 7522.  This is a sufficient            
          explanation to apprise petitioner with regard to the NOL                    
          deductions, and the burden of proof has not shifted to respondent           
          on that issue.                                                              
               Petitioner has failed to present sufficient evidence to                
          substantiate the claimed carryover losses that it deducted in               
          taxable years 1991 or 1993.  In addition, petitioner's expert               
          report does not address the value of the license in taxable years           
          1989 and 1990.  We sustain respondent's determination.                      
          Adjustment to Gross Sales                                                   
               Respondent determined that petitioner's gross sales as shown           
          on its books and records are greater than its gross sales as                
          reported on its 1991 income tax return.  Petitioner reduced gross           
          sales reflected on its books for 1991 in the amount of $7,095 in            
          reporting gross sales to correct a customer overbilling.  It                
          introduced business records reflecting the overbilling, including           
          the invoices, a credit memorandum, and business journals.  In               
          addition, Maitland explained the nature of the discrepancy in the           
          amount of gross sales reported and shown on petitioner's books              



Page:  Previous  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011