- 5 - address. There is no evidence to indicate whether the CRNA Trust and the Family Trust are one in the same. NAA filed 1991 and 1992 Federal tax returns, signed by petitioner as general partner. On the Schedule K-1, Partner's Share of Income, Credits, Deductions, Etc., attached to NAA's 1991 and 1992 returns, NAA reported the 1991 and 1992 income of both the CRNA Trust and Oania as $80,505 and $72,130, respectively. In the notice of deficiency, respondent determined that petitioner failed to report income of $23,133 and $21,750 for 1991 and 1992, respectively. In respondent's second amendment to answer filed on January 6, 1997, respondent increased petitioner's 1991 and 1992 income tax by "50 percent of $55,425" and "50 percent of $28,728", respectively. There is no evidence to indicate that either the CRNA Trust or the Family Trust ever filed returns or paid taxes for the years in issue. OPINION 1. Unreported Income Respondent determined that petitioner earned compensation from his nurse anesthetic services that he failed to include in gross income. Petitioner argues that the CRNA Trust earned the disputed income, rather than he. We agree with respondent that the compensation is taxable to petitioner. Petitioner must prove that respondent's determinations set forth in her notice of deficiency are incorrect. Rule 142(a); Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S. 111, 115 (1933); Potts, Davis & Co.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011