James C. Estrada - Page 5

                                        - 5 -                                         
          address.  There is no evidence to indicate whether the CRNA Trust           
          and the Family Trust are one in the same.                                   
               NAA filed 1991 and 1992 Federal tax returns, signed by                 
          petitioner as general partner.  On the Schedule K-1, Partner's              
          Share of Income, Credits, Deductions, Etc., attached to NAA's               
          1991 and 1992 returns, NAA reported the 1991 and 1992 income of             
          both the CRNA Trust and Oania as $80,505 and $72,130,                       
          respectively.  In the notice of deficiency, respondent determined           
          that petitioner failed to report income of $23,133 and $21,750              
          for 1991 and 1992, respectively.  In respondent's second                    
          amendment to answer filed on January 6, 1997, respondent                    
          increased petitioner's 1991 and 1992 income tax by "50 percent of           
          $55,425" and "50 percent of $28,728", respectively.  There is no            
          evidence to indicate that either the CRNA Trust or the Family               
          Trust ever filed returns or paid taxes for the years in issue.              
                                       OPINION                                        
          1.  Unreported Income                                                       
               Respondent determined that petitioner earned compensation              
          from his nurse anesthetic services that he failed to include in             
          gross income.  Petitioner argues that the CRNA Trust earned the             
          disputed income, rather than he.  We agree with respondent that             
          the compensation is taxable to petitioner.                                  
               Petitioner must prove that respondent's determinations set             
          forth in her notice of deficiency are incorrect.  Rule 142(a);              
          Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S. 111, 115 (1933); Potts, Davis & Co.            




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011