Frederick M. Fox - Page 3

                                                                                - 3 -- 3 -                                                                                 

                    income from stock sales were includable in gross income; (3) he                                                                                        
                    had itemized deductions in the amounts of $31,060, $40,354, and                                                                                        
                    $37,704 for 1989 to 1991, and a standard deduction in the amount                                                                                       
                    of $3,600 for 1992; and (4) he was liable for additions to tax                                                                                         
                    for failure to file returns and failure to pay estimated tax for                                                                                       
                    1989 to 1992.  In the petition, petitioner also contended:  (1)                                                                                        
                    Respondent's answers to his inquiries were not courteous or                                                                                            
                    considerate, and (2) respondent violated his rights under the                                                                                          
                    Taxpayer Bill of Rights, subtitle J of the Technical and                                                                                               
                    Miscellaneous Revenue Act of 1988 (TAMRA), Pub. L. 100-647, 102                                                                                        
                    Stat. 334, and other rights.                                                                                                                           
                              The facts upon which petitioner relies in his petition to                                                                                    
                    support these contentions are:                                                                                                                         
                              he was never notified by the District Director that he                                                                                       
                              was required to maintain books and records and file a                                                                                        
                              return in accordance with IRC 6001 and 26 CFR 1.                                                                                             
                              6001(d);                                                                                                                                     
                              * * * the Form 1040 is not associated with nor is it                                                                                         
                              the form required to be used to collect the income tax                                                                                       
                              under IRC Subtitle A, section 1;                                                                                                             
                              * * * there has been a trespass of jurisdiction on the                                                                                       
                              part of the Commissioner and petitioner squarely                                                                                             
                              challenges the Commissioner's jurisdiction in issuing                                                                                        
                              these notices of deficiency.                                                                                                                 
                              Nothing listed by petitioner as facts could possibly justify                                                                                 
                    a holding that respondent's determinations are incorrect.                                                                                              








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011