- 6 -- 6 - 4. A copy of a notice of bill from Frederick J. Fox dated December 9, 1992. Petitioner responded "Denies. Wrong Frederick Fox."2 5. A copy of an affidavit of applicable law and denial of specific liability for Federal income taxes during calendar years 1989-92 from petitioner dated June 9, 1993. Petitioner admits. 6. A copy of letters from petitioner dated April 12, 1994. Petitioner admits. 7. A copy of a document from petitioner entitled "DEMAND for you to PROVE the existence of JURISDICTION at the administrative level" dated June 6, 1994. Petitioner admits. 8. A copy of a document from petitioner entitled "BY AFFIDAVIT" dated April 14, 1995. Petitioner admits. 9. A copy of a document from petitioner entitled "MEMORANDUM AT LAW BY AFFIDAVIT" dated June 20, 1996. Petitioner admits. The statements by and letters and documents from petitioner attached to respondent's motion for summary judgment and request for admissions recite various frivolous tax protester arguments. Discussion A. Respondent's Motion for Summary Judgment 2We do not consider this document in deciding whether to grant respondent's motion for summary judgment.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011