- 4 - National's establishing a sinking fund or reserve for the payment of principal and interest on the Fries note, and the note was not secured. Concurrently with the execution of the Fries note, Brands advanced $24,900 as a "loan" to National and in exchange therefor received a note on terms similar to the Fries note. Either Tucker or Tavistock also advanced funds to National of $49,800 at this time under similar terms. Burkhalter did not make such an advance to National. Immediately after the advances, National had a debt to equity ratio of 166 to 1 ($149,400 notes to $900 equity). From the start, the expectation of the shareholders was that the operations would generate the cash profits to repay the advances. On the same day that National received the advances, petitioner conveyed an interest in his house to Tavistock in exchange for $75,000. Petitioner understood that, as a condition of his employment with National, he was required to infuse capital into the company. However, he did not have any cash on hand, nor was he in a position to risk substantial amounts of money at the time. Therefore, he mortgaged his residence to Tavistock and contributed the proceeds to National. National issued the Fries note in return for that infusion of cash. Shortly after these transactions were completed, National acquired an operating travel agency from Clark Howard (Howard), called Action Travel (Action), for roughly $200,000. NationalPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011