- 26 -                                         
          valuation misstatement.  Sec. 6662(b)(1)-(3).  The term                     
          "underpayment of tax" is defined by section 6664(a) to mean, as             
          relevant herein, the amount by which the income tax imposed by              
          law exceeds the amount of income tax reported by the taxpayer on            
          the taxpayer's income tax return.                                           
               Also as relevant herein, the accuracy-related penalty does             
          not apply with respect to any portion of the underpayment if it             
          is shown that there was reasonable cause for such portion and               
          that the taxpayer acted in good faith with respect to such                  
          portion.  Sec. 6664(c)(1).  The determination of whether a                  
          taxpayer acted with reasonable cause and in good faith is made on           
          a case-by-case basis, taking into account all the pertinent facts           
          and circumstances.  Sec. 1.6664-4(b)(1), Income Tax Regs.  The              
          most important factor is the extent of the taxpayer's effort to             
          assess the taxpayer's proper tax liability for the year.  Id.               
               Petitioner bears the burden of proving that respondent's               
          determination of the accuracy-related penalty is erroneous.  Rule           
          142(a); INDOPCO Inc. v. Commissioner, 503 U.S. 79, 84 (1992);               
          Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S. 111, 115 (1933).  Moreover, in                 
          evaluating evidence, the Court is not bound to accept as gospel,            
          the unverified and undocumented testimony of a taxpayer.                    
          Tokarski v. Commissioner, 87 T.C. 74, 77 (1986); Hradesky v.                
          Commissioner, 65 T.C. 87, 90 (1975), affd. per curiam 540 F.2d              
          821 (5th Cir. 1976).                                                        
Page:  Previous   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   NextLast modified: May 25, 2011