Donald S. Hazelton - Page 5

                                        - 5 -                                         

          proposed adjustments in the 30-day letter.  In this protest,                
          petitioner requested an appeals conference and further asserted             
          that (1) respondent had failed to account for petitioner's                  
          deductible losses and business expenses, (2) petitioner was                 
          married during 1992, and, therefore, the income from third-party            
          payers was community property income of which only 50 percent was           
          taxable to him, (3) respondent had failed to allow petitioner the           
          correct standard deduction as well as a dependency exemption for            
          his son, (4) respondent had failed to account for an overpayment            
          from petitioner's 1994 tax year that had already been applied               
          toward his proposed deficiency for 1992, and (5) the additions to           
          tax should not be imposed because petitioner's failure to file a            
          return and pay estimated taxes was due to reasonable cause.  The            
          protest contained a detailed recitation of facts and legal                  
          arguments to support petitioner's assertions; however, very                 
          little relevant supporting documentation was submitted with the             
          protest.  Specifically, petitioner submitted:  (1) A Form 2848,             
          power of attorney; (2) the aforementioned Form 4868, request for            
          a filing extension for 1992; (3) his wife's Federal income tax              
          return for 1992 (filed March 15, 1994); (4) a profit and loss               
          statement that was prepared by the petitioner with regard to his            
          1992 contract work at Seton Medical Center;3 (5) two "Notices of            


          3     Petitioner also reported on this statement that his truck             
          was repossessed by G.M.A.C. during 1992, entitling him to a loss.           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011