Donald S. Hazelton - Page 16

                                       - 16 -                                         

               In deciding whether petitioner is entitled to administrative           
          costs, the Court takes into account the information available to            
          respondent from the date the notice of deficiency was mailed and            
          from that point forward through the date respondent's answer was            
          filed in the legal proceeding.  Between the time that the notice            
          of deficiency was mailed and the time respondent's answer was               
          filed, petitioner provided no records or pertinent documentation            
          to respondent.  Accordingly, respondent was substantially                   
          justified in maintaining the positions determined in the notice             
          of deficiency, and, therefore, respondent's position in the                 
          administrative proceeding was substantially justified.                      
               The Court next addresses the reasonableness of respondent's            
          position in the litigation aspects of the case.  After the                  
          petition was filed and before respondent filed the answer, there            
          were no contacts or efforts to settle the case between petitioner           
          and respondent.  At the time the answer was filed, respondent did           
          not have sufficient information to consider that petitioner's               
          claims were properly substantiated.  After respondent filed an              
          answer, an appeals conference was held with petitioner, and, as a           
          result of that conference, the case settled.  On this record, as            
          soon as proper documentation was submitted to respondent by                 
          petitioner, at the appeals conference with the appeals officer,             
          respondent allowed petitioner's claimed deductions, conceded that           







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011