Michael James Heun - Page 5

                                        - 5 -                                         
          was able to, and did, prevent a Form W-2 (Wage and Tax Statement)           
          from being sent by that company to him, the Internal Revenue                
          Service, or the State of Arizona with respect to his wage income            
          for each of the years 1984 through 1988.  Nor were any Forms 1099           
          filed in the name of petitioner for those years.                            
               During 1985, petitioner established The Five Star Trust and            
          began to transfer certain of his assets into the name of that               
          trust.                                                                      
                                     Discussion                                       
               Petitioner bears the burden of proving that respondent's               
          determinations in the notices of the deficiencies and the addi-             
          tions to tax under section 6654 are in error.  Rule 142(a); Welch           
          v. Helvering, 290 U.S. 111, 115 (1933).  Respondent bears the               
          burden of proof on the fraud issue, and that burden is to be                
          carried by clear and convincing evidence.  Rule 142(b); sec.                
          7454(a).                                                                    
               Throughout the course of this proceeding from its commence-            
          ment when petitioner timely filed a petition in this Court                  
          through the brief that he filed after this case was submitted,              
          petitioner has persisted in advancing matters that are, inter               
          alia, frivolous, groundless, irrelevant, immaterial, and/or                 
          nonsensical.                                                                
               On the record before us, we find that petitioner has failed            
          to show error in respondent's determinations of the deficiencies            
          and the additions to tax under 6654.  Consequently, we sustain              




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011