Michael James Heun - Page 6

                                        - 6 -                                         
          those determinations.                                                       
               We now turn to the fraud issue.  We deal separately with               
          1983, the year for which petitioner was convicted of, inter alia,           
          criminal tax evasion under section 7201.  We conclude that that             
          conviction collaterally estops petitioner from denying that the             
          underpayment for 1983 is due to fraud for purposes of section               
          6653(b).  E.g., DiLeo v. Commissioner, 96 T.C. 858, 885-886                 
          (1991), affd. 959 F.2d 16 (2d Cir. 1992).                                   
               With respect to each of the years 1984 through 1988,                   
          respondent must prove by clear and convincing evidence that an              
          underpayment exists and fraudulent intent.  Rule 142(b); sec.               
          7454(a).  Petitioner filed delinquent returns for each of those             
          years in which he showed that he received wages.  On the record             
          before us, we find that an underpayment exists for each of the              
          years 1984 through 1988.                                                    
               In order to prove fraudulent intent, the U.S. Court of                 
          Appeals for the Tenth Circuit (Court of Appeals), to which an               
          appeal in this case would ordinarily lie, has held that                     
               a taxpayer is not liable for the civil fraud penalties                 
               unless he commits some affirmative act of concealment                  
               or misrepresentation.  Mere failure to file, whether                   
               disclosed or not, does not justify the fraud penalties                 
               even when the taxpayer knows that taxes are due.  [Zell                
               v. Commissioner, 763 F.2d 1139, 1146 (10th Cir. 1985),                 
               affg. T.C. Memo. 1984-152.]                                            
          Applying the foregoing proof requirements that the Court of                 
          Appeals imposes on respondent, see Golsen v. Commissioner, 54               
          T.C. 742 (1970), affd. 445 F.2d 985 (10th Cir. 1971), respondent            




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011