Gerald Hickman - Page 13

                                       - 13 -                                         

          collateral estoppel is not satisfied.  We therefore find that               
          respondent is not collaterally estopped from asserting tax                  
          deficiencies for the 1986 through 1988 tax years.                           
               B.  Respondent's Deficiency Determination                              
               Respondent determined that petitioner underpaid his 1986               
          through 1988 income tax by $10,690, $17,884, and $19,350,                   
          respectively.  The underpayment is attributable to petitioner's             
          failure to file his income tax returns for 1986 through 1988, and           
          report income earned in his capacity as a self-employed                     
          independent contractor.  Petitioner does not argue that                     
          respondent's determination of the deficiency is incorrect.  We              
          therefore sustain respondent's determination.                               
          II.  Res Judicata and The Additions To Tax                                  
               As an initial matter, petitioner argues that the doctrine of           
          res judicata bars respondent from litigating petitioner's                   
          liability for any additions to tax.  Petitioner contends that the           
          Government's failure to raise the issue of any additions to tax             
          in the criminal proceeding precludes respondent from raising the            
          issue before this Court.                                                    
               Res judicata (claim preclusion) precludes relitigation of              
          issues that were or could have been raised regarding a cause of             
          action.  Commissioner v. Sunnen, 333 U.S. 591 (1948).  Under the            
          doctrine of res judicata, when a court of competent jurisdiction            
          has entered a final judgment on the merits of a cause of action,            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011