Estate of Carolyn W. Holland, Deceased, Jack K. Holland, Lewis G. Holland, Sr., and Betty H. Kann, Executors - Page 56

                                        -56-                                          
          consider whether the expense was "necessarily incurred" as                  
          required under respondent's regulations.                                    
               Section 20.2053-3(d)(1), Estate Tax Regs., provides:                   
               Expenses necessarily incurred in preserving and distributing           
               the estate are deductible, including the cost of storing or            
               maintaining property of the estate, if it is impossible to             
               effect immediate distribution to the beneficiaries.                    
               Expenses for preserving and caring for the property * * *              
               may not be allowed for a longer period than the executor is            
               reasonably required to retain the property.                            

               Therefore, in resolving the issue of whether the estimated             
          expense of maid service for 5 years is deductible from the value            
          of the gross estate we must find: (1) It is impossible to effect            
          immediate distribution of decedent's interest in the condominium            
          to the beneficiaries, and (2) the expense is necessarily incurred           
          in preserving the estate prior to distribution of property to the           
          persons entitled to it and not incurred for the individual                  
          benefit of the heirs, legatees, or devisees.                                
               At the time of trial of this case, decedent had been dead              
          for more than 5 years, and the executors of her estate had not              
          yet distributed her interest in the condominium to the                      
          beneficiaries.  Despite the extended length of time, petitioner             
          offered no evidence of any impediment to the distribution or sale           
          of the property that would explain the delay.  Furthermore, Jack            
          testified that decedent's interest in the condominium was never             
          offered for sale.                                                           







Page:  Previous  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011