- 2 - accuracy-related penalty in the amount of $302 pursuant to section 6662(a). A computational adjustment was made. The Court must decide whether section 280A and the overall limitation set forth in section 280A(c)(5) are applicable to business expense deductions claimed by petitioner in connection with her art/fine art business located in the building where petitioner resided. Respondent has conceded that petitioner is not liable for the penalty under section 6662(a). Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found. For clarity and convenience, our findings of fact and opinion have been combined. Petitioner resided in Berkeley, California, when her petition was filed. On her 1992 Federal income tax return, petitioner reported wages of $25,308 that she earned as a part-time teacher at St. Paul's and at Ecole Bilingue. On her 1992 return, petitioner also reported a net loss of $6,925 from her art/fine art business. She reported $2,400 in gross receipts from that business on her Schedule C. She subtracted $1,159 as the cost of goods sold and reported gross income of $1,241. She claimed as deductions the following expenses on her Schedule C: Expense Amount Car & Truck $ 672 Legal 185 Office 80 Rent 6,740 Repairs & Maintenance 100Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011