Diane Cameron Horton - Page 3

                                        - 3 -3                                        

                    Supplies                     68                                   
          Utilities                     146                                           
          Other-telephone              45                                             
          Other-books/pub              75                                             
          Other-dues                   55                                             
          $8,166                                                                      
               Respondent disallowed the $6,740 claimed as a rent expense             
          deduction by petitioner pursuant to section 280A(c)(5).                     
               During 1992, petitioner leased the upper and lower stories             
          of one half of a building located at 2743 Tenth Street, Berkeley,           
          California, for $1,050 per month, or $12,600 per year.  For our             
          purposes, we shall ignore the other half of the two-story                   
          building and refer to petitioner's premises as "Tenth Street" or            
          "premises".  The lease was entitled "Commercial Lease and Deposit           
          Receipt".  The lease specifically stated that the premises were             
          to be used for "painting and residence."                                    
               The Tenth Street building was located in a manufacturing               
          district and was in a commercially zoned area.  There was one               
          address for the premises and one lease for the premises.  The               
          rent and utilities were charged and paid as a unit for the                  
          premises.                                                                   
               Petitioner and her son resided in the upper level of the               
          premises.  She used the lower level for her art/fine art                    
          business.                                                                   
               Petitioner contends that she leased the Tenth Street                   
          premises for the primary purpose of her art/fine art business.              
          She further argues that section 280A does not apply to her                  




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011