Sooren Hovhannissian and Estate of Mary Hovhannissian, Deceased, Sooren Hovhannissian, Executor - Page 17

                                       - 17 -                                         

               The operation of section 1038(b) and (c) illustrates why it            
          is appropriate that petitioner should be liable for income tax on           
          hitherto untaxed amounts received prior to the reacquisition.  In           
          1988, petitioner recognized $336,192 of the $719,480 received as            
          part of the consideration for the sale of the 225-235 Boston                
          Avenue property and deferred the balance under section 453(c).              
          Section 1038(b)(1) requires the recognition of that balance,                
          $383,288, up to the limit imposed by section 1038(b)(2) of the              
          original sale price less petitioner’s claimed presale basis, or             
          $1,186,343.9  Section 1038(b) ensures that all receipts of cash             
          and other property by the seller prior to reacquisition are taxed           
          as income to return the seller to as close to status quo ante               

               8(...continued)                                                        
          market value of the property.  If the 1988 sale were analyzed as            
          the sale of an option to buy the 225-235 Boston Avenue property,            
          the overall Federal tax consequences would be similar to the                
          operation of sec. 1038, although the timing of recognition and              
          adjustment to basis would differ.  Only when an option lapses               
          does the grantor of an option include in gross income the amount            
          received for the option, id. at 763, Koch v. Commissioner, 67               
          T.C. 71, 82 (1976); see also Rev. Rul. 78-182, 1978-1 C.B. 265,             
          267; Rev. Rul. 58-234, 1958-1 C.B. 279, 283, as short-term                  
          capital gain, sec. 1234(b)(1).  The option grantor retains his              
          property with its basis unchanged.  The more favorable treatment            
          of a seller who reacquires real property under sec. 1038 in terms           
          of allowed adjustments to basis belies petitioner’s argument that           
          sec. 1038 is unconstitutional in its application to the facts of            
          his case.  See also Greene v. Commissioner, 76 T.C. 1018 (1981).            
               9 Sec. 1038(b)(2) limits the amount required to be                     
          recognized under sec. 1038(b)(1) to the amount by which the sale            
          price exceeds the sum of: (1) presale basis; (2) amounts                    
          previously recognized; and, (3) amounts paid in connection with             
          the reacquisition (in this case, nothing) ($2,710,000 -                     
          (1,187,465 + 336,192 + 0) = 1,186,343).                                     




Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011