Sooren Hovhannissian and Estate of Mary Hovhannissian, Deceased, Sooren Hovhannissian, Executor - Page 18

                                       - 18 -                                         

          with respect to the reacquired property as circumstances will               
          permit.  Section 1038(c)10 recalculates petitioner’s basis in the           
          reacquired property to account for the original, presale basis              
          that the seller had in the property, plus other adjustments such            
          as sales costs, as reflected in the seller’s basis in the debt              
          instrument under section 453, see sec. 1.453-9(b)(2), Income Tax            
          Regs., plus the gain reported under section 1038(b), sec.                   
          1038(c)(1), gain reported in prior taxable years, sec.                      
          1038(c)(2), and any amounts paid in connection with the                     
          reacquisition, sec. 1.1038-1(g)(1)(iii), Income Tax Regs.  The              
          operation of these two subsections leaves the seller having paid            
          all Federal taxes due on cash and other property received prior             
          to reacquisition, and in possession of his original property with           
          an increased basis.                                                         
               In light of the foregoing, we hold that section 1038 governs           
          petitioner’s reacquisition of the real property at 225-235 Boston           
          Avenue in satisfaction of the indebtedness arising from its sale,           
          sec. 1.1038-1(a), Income Tax Regs.  Section 1038 governs the                
          entire reacquisition even though the property has been                      
          substantially changed through incomplete modifications to both              
          the erstwhile furniture store and the structure on the rear                 

               10 There is conflicting evidence in the record with respect            
          to petitioner’s basis in the parking structure at the time of the           
          1988 sale, which will have a direct bearing on the calculation of           
          petitioner’s post-reacquisition basis in the property under sec.            
          1038(c).                                                                    




Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011