a settlement with respondent regarding his liabilities for all taxable years. The findings of fact underlying the substantive dispute between the parties can be found in this Court's memorandum opinion, Jacoby v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1996-477. The issue in the underlying case was whether petitioner qualified as an innocent spouse. Section 7430(a) authorizes the Court to award reasonable litigation costs to taxpayers who prevail against the United States in civil tax litigation. Respondent concedes that petitioner substantially prevailed with respect to the amount in controversy and with respect to the most significant issue. Sec. 7430(c)(2)(A)(ii). Respondent also concedes that petitioner has not unreasonably protracted this proceeding. Sec. 7430(b)(4). Petitioner has satisfied the so-called net worth requirement set forth in section 7430(c)(2)(A)(iii). We must decide (1) whether respondent's litigating position was "not substantially justified", as that phrase is used in section 7430(c)(2)(A)(i) (now section 7430(c)(4)(A)(i)), and (2) whether petitioner exhausted her administrative remedies as required by section 7430(b)(1). If those questions are resolved in favor of petitioner, then we must decide whether the amount of attorney's fees claimed by petitioner is reasonable. We hold that petitioner failed to exhaust her administrative remedies.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011