All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the years in issue, unless otherwise indicated, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure. References to section 7430 are to that section as amended by section 1551 of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, Pub. L. 99-514, 100 Stat. 2085, 2752 (effective for proceedings commenced after Dec. 31, 1985). Section 7430 was amended most recently by the Taxpayer Bill of Rights 2, Pub. L. 104-168, secs. 701-704, 110 Stat. 1452, 1463-1464 (1996), applicable to proceedings commenced after July 30, 1996. The parties do not dispute that this proceeding was commenced before July 30, 1996. We decide petitioner's motion on the basis of the motion, memoranda of law, and affidavits submitted by the parties. Neither party requested a hearing, and we conclude that a hearing is not necessary. Rule 232(a)(3). We first address whether petitioner exhausted the administrative remedies available to her within the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) as required by section 7430(b)(1). Respondent contends that petitioner failed to exhaust her administrative remedies because she never requested an Appeals conference after respondent issued a 30-day letter on October 6, 1984. Petitioner does not dispute that respondent issued a 30- day letter. Petitioner makes no argument that the 30-day letter was never received either by her, Gerald, or theirPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011