Carl E. Jones and Elaine Y. Jones - Page 36

                                                -36-                                                  
                  paid their debt to Lubbock in 1970 the taxpayers had made no                        
                  additional investment in Albuquerque that would increase                            
                  their adjusted basis in an indebtedness of Albuquerque to                           
                  them * * *. [535 F.2d at 312; fn. refs. omitted.]                                   
                  In Estate of Leavitt v. Commissioner, 90 T.C. 206 (1988),                           
            affd. 875 F.2d 420 (4th Cir. 1989), we reiterated our position                            
            that the guaranty of a loan without actual economic outlay does                           
            not increase a shareholder's basis in the corporation.  However,                          
            the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held in Selfe v.                            
            United States, 778 F.2d 769 (11th Cir. 1985), that although                               
            economic outlay is required to increase a shareholder's basis, it                         
            is not always necessary for the shareholder to actually absolve                           
            the corporation's debt to pass the test.  If the facts                                    
            demonstrate that in substance the shareholder borrowed funds and                          
            advanced them to the corporation, an increase in basis is                                 
            warranted.  The instant case is appealable in the Eleventh                                
            Circuit, and we are constrained to follow the law in that                                 
            circuit.  Golsen v. Commissioner, 54 T.C. 742 (1970), affd. 445                           
            F.2d 985 (10th Cir. 1971).  However, the facts of the case before                         
            us do not fall within the scope of the Court of Appeals' holding                          
            in Selfe.                                                                                 
                  In Selfe, the shareholders made loan guaranties to                                  
            disinterested third parties in arm's-length transactions.                                 
            Clearly, acting as a guarantor in an arm's-length loan with a                             
            disinterested party is not the same as interjecting oneself as                            
            the middleman in several loan obligations between one's wholly                            





Page:  Previous  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011