Melvin J. Laney and Carolyn A. Laney - Page 39

                                               - 39 -                                                 

            show the legitimacy of R.K. and to provide Darrow’s opinion as to                         
            the value of R.K., if that project had not been cut off in its                            
            infancy.  Darrow had been director of a primate center for Litton                         
            Bionetics under contract to NIH in 1978, when he was approached                           
            by American Cyanamid Co. (hereinafter sometimes referred to as                            
            American Cyanamid) to review plans for R.K.  In August 1978,                              
            Darrow began to work for American Cyanamid.  He was hired to                              
            direct American Cyanamid’s primate breeding and research work                             
            that was planned to be carried out on the Island.  He continued                           
            to work for American Cyanamid in this role until March 1982.  The                         
            Court was satisfied that Darrow’s prior experience in responsible                         
            positions in creating or supervising primate research operations,                         
            and his lengthy involvement in R.K. planning as an American                               
            Cyanamid employee, qualified him as an expert witness in the                              
            offered matters.  Darrow valued R.K. at $19,200,000, entirely on                          
            the basis of an analysis of the cage fees that Laney was likely                           
            to receive from the operations of R.K.  To us, Darrow’s analysis                          
            emphasizes the substantial differences between R.K. and Laney’s                           
            established trade or business as a consultant.                                            
                  Also, Laney kept separate books and records for his                                 
            consulting services expenditures and his R.K. expenditures; he                            
            generally deducted his consulting services expenditures currently                         
            but capitalized his R.K. expenditures.  Laney testified that he                           







Page:  Previous  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011