- 27 - Respondent disallowed the deductions, and both notices of deficiency give the same explanation for these adjustments: "Because there is no business purpose for this transaction your deduction is denied." Partnership Loss Issue Petitioner's 1987 and 1988 income tax returns claim deductions on Schedule E, Supplemental Income Schedule, for partnership losses in the aggregate amounts of $97,789.65 and $21,986.69, respectively. Set out below is a schedule of the partnership losses claimed in each year: Petitioner's Income Tax Returns 1987 1988 Speed Line Investment ($2,091.48) ($2,035.02) Oakbrook III, Ltd. (32,104.53) (12,453.97) Dondi Presidents' Partnership II(7,050.85) 422.35 1626 NY Associates Ltd. Partnership(24,273.40) (4,931.60) Bear Creek West Rental Properties(6,035.00) -- Haywood Lane Joint Venture(10,102.50) -- Murfreesboro Road Joint Venture(9,082.00) -- Lemons & Hite (751.37) (646.29) Dondi Motor Car Properties(2,166.00) (2,283.98) Berkley Apartments Ltd. Partnership(4,067.51) (640.68) Caprice Investments (271.51) -- Freeport-McMoran 206.50 594.00 Energy Partners., Ltd. -- -- Freeport-McMoran -- 6.50 Resource Partners., Ltd. -- -- (97,789.65) (21,968.69) Mrs. Lemons' returns claim identical deductions. The notices of deficiency issued to petitioners adjust the above partnership losses by disallowing $57,634 of the amount claimed in 1987 and $29,448 of the amount claimed in 1988. Both notices of deficiency provide the followingPage: Previous 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011