- 35 - amount of $620,000. Respondent determined in the notices of deficiency that petitioners are not entitled to deduct ordinary losses of $620,000, but are entitled to deduct long-term capital losses of $560,000. Several aspects of respondent's determinations should be noted. First, respondent's determinations that petitioners realized capital losses in 1986 are, in effect, determinations that the losses qualify under section 165(c)(1) as losses incurred in a trade or business, or under section 165(c)(2) as losses incurred in a transaction entered into for profit. We have no reason, to conclude that respondent determined that the losses arose from a casualty within the meaning of section 165(c)(3). Second, respondent determined that the amount of the capital loss that can be deducted by each petitioner is $560,000, rather than $620,000, the amount claimed on their returns. In effect, respondent determined that petitioner's basis in the eight club memberships that became worthless was $1,120,000 (i.e., 2 x $560,000), rather than $1,240,000 (i.e., 2 x $620,000). Presumably, respondent agreed that petitioner's basis included each of the eight initiation fee notes payable to the club in the principal amount of $140,000, but did not include the membership fees of $15,000, for each membership thatPage: Previous 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011