- 3 - All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code for the years under consideration. All Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure. All dollar amounts are rounded. Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found. The stipulation of facts and the attached exhibits are incorporated herein by this reference. General Findings Petitioners, husband and wife, resided in Carmichael, California, at the time they filed their petition challenging respondent's determinations. Petitioners timely filed joint Federal income tax returns for each of the years under consideration. On June 1, 1992, petitioners were issued a refund of $1,351 for tax year 1988. The refund resulted from petitioners' request for a tentative refund based upon a claimed net operating loss carryback from 1991. For convenience and clarity, we have combined additional findings of fact and opinion with respect to each issue. Issue 1. Characterization of Advances From Robert Randall Co. Petitioner husband Mark D. Morgan (hereinafter referred to as petitioner) has been involved for many years in real estate activities, particularly the construction of real estate. In June 1988, he began working for Robert Randall Co. which is in the business of developing and managing apartment complexes. Previously, petitioner had been employed by Gibraltar CommunityPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011