Mark D. and Sheldon C. Morgan - Page 5

                                        - 5 -                                         
                                   Amount of           Amount of                      
                         Year      Wages               Advances                       
                         1988      $11,008             $40,950                        
                         1989      18,000              75,600                         
                         1990      18,000              84,600                         
                         1991      18,000              87,600                         
               The advances include the following amounts designated as an            
          automobile allowance:                                                       
                         1988      $1,300                                             
                         1989      2,400                                              
                         1990      5,550                                              
                         1991      6,600                                              
               The advances were paid on a monthly basis as follows:                  
                         June 1988                     $3,150                         
                         July 1988-Mar. 1990           6,300                          
                         Apr. 1990-Dec. 1991      7,300                               
               Robert Randall Co. did not withhold for income tax or FICA tax         
          on the advances.                                                            
               As of the date of trial, petitioner had not repaid any of the          
          advances.  The advances were not evidenced by notes, nor was                
          collateral given. Nor did Robert Randall Co. inquire into                   
          petitioner's ability to repay the advances.  There were no specific         
          repayment terms or fixed maturity dates.  Rather, the advances were         
          to be charged against petitioner's share of profits of partnerships         
          to be formed between petitioner and Robert Randall.                         
               Respondent determined that the advances petitioner received            
          from Robert Randall Co. constitute taxable compensation for                 
          services.  Petitioners claim that the advances were nontaxable              
          loans. Except for 1988, petitioners bear the burden of proving              





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011