- 25 - section 83 purposes must be determined as though the restrictions did not exist. Sec. 83(b). There are three generally accepted methods of determining the value of stock: The market comparison approach, the income approach, and the cost approach. Fishman, "Valuation Termination and Methodology", in Financial Valuation: Businesses and Business Interests par. 2.7 (Zukin ed. 1990). Under the market comparison approach, the value of stock is determined by comparison to the stock of similar companies with publicly traded stock. Id. at par. 2.8. Under the income approach, the value of stock is equal to the present value of the company's future income stream. Id. at par. 2.9. Under the cost approach, the value of stock is equal to the fair market value of the company's assets less the total amount of liabilities. Id. at par. 2.10. We note that we are not bound by the methods or opinions of any of the experts who testify at trial, but may use their opinions to assist in determining the value of the subject property. Chiu v. Commissioner, 84 T.C. 722, 734 (1985); Estate of Campbell v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1991-615. One expert may be persuasive on a particular element of valuation, and another may be persuasive on another element. Parker v. Commissioner, 86 T.C. 547, 562 (1986). Thus, we may adopt some aspectsPage: Previous 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011