- 23 -                                         
          any other programming language.  Thus, operating and applications           
          software, which is the product of converting a source code by               
          means of a compiler into configurations of machine-readable                 
          computer language known as executable code, is analogous to the             
          output tapes that were produced from the field tapes using a                
          digital computer.  See Texas Instruments, Inc. v. United States,            
          551 F.2d at 608 (“the impulses recorded on the field tapes were             
          taken to a processing center where background noise or signals              
          were eliminated.  With the retained or primary signals sharpened            
          by the editing process, a ‘final’ or ‘output’ tape was                      
          produced.”).  Essentially, for the purposes of applying the                 
          intrinsic value test as interpreted by this Court, the seismic              
          data were as inextricably bound to the field and output tapes in            
          Texas Instruments, Inc. v. United States, 551 F.2d 599 (5th Cir.            
          1977), as the master source codes were to the tapes and disks in            
          Comshare, Inc. v. United States, 27 F.3d 1142 (6th Cir. 1994),              
          and the configurations of executable code are to the tapes and              
          disks in the present case.                                                  
               D.   Weakness of the Intrinsic Value Test                              
               Application of this Court's interpretation of the intrinsic            
          value test to the facts in Texas Instruments, Comshare, and the             
          present case does not produce meaningful distinctions that                  
          justify differential treatment for purposes of the ITC.  Indeed,            
          our interpretation of the intrinsic value test calls into                   
          question the Fifth Circuit's application of the very test it                
Page:  Previous   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   NextLast modified: May 25, 2011