25- - Neither testified or qualified as an expert. Mrs. Oliver offered only her uncorroborated testimony that Mr. Bernardi often does such estimates. Petitioners obtained Mr. Hester's estimate in 1993, several years after the claimed damage occurred, and thus we seriously doubt whether it was an accurate estimate of the cost to repair damage that occurred in 1988. The estimates made by Mr. Bernardi and Mr. Hester do not show the decrease in fair market value of the home caused by the 1988 storm. Petitioners have presented no reliable evidence of the repairs made to the home as a result of the storm. An estimate of the cost to repair damage caused by a casualty ordinarily does not establish the amount of the casualty loss, as contemplated by section 1.165-7(a)(2)(i) and (ii), Income Tax Regs., unless the repairs are actually made. Lamphere v. Commissioner, 70 T.C. 391, 396 (1978). Furthermore, even if the repairs detailed in the estimates were made, petitioners have not shown that the amount of repairs was no greater than necessary to restore the home to its condition prior to the storm, as required by section 1.165- 7(a)(2)(ii), Income Tax Regs. Indeed, their home underwent a major renovation which increased its size from 3,700 square feet before the storm to approximately 9,000 square feet after the storm. Likewise, petitioners' Personal Property Inventory Booklet is not persuasive to show that they sustained losses to theirPage: Previous 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011