P.D.B. Sports, Ltd., Bowlen Sports, Inc., Tax Matters Partner - Page 5

                                        - 5 -                                         
          of Bowlen's purchase, Bowlen I owned the following assets:  the             
          NFL franchise for the Broncos, professional football player                 
          contracts, a stadium lease, and television rights.  Bowlen I's              
          adjusted basis in the player contracts on May 31, 1984, before              
          the sale of the partnership interests to Bowlen II, was                     
          $6,510,555.4                                                                
               Bowlen I treated the sale of the partnership interest to               
          Bowlen as causing a section 708(b)(1)(B) termination of the                 
          partnership for Federal tax purposes.  Adams consented to the               
          transfer of Kaiser's partnership interests to Bowlen and entered            
          into a new partnership agreement with Bowlen II in order to                 
          prevent dissolution of the partnership under State law.  The                
          Broncos franchise, held by Bowlen I, was not separately for sale.           
          The parties' transactions were in form and substance the sale of            
          partnership interests as opposed to a sale of the underlying                
          partnership assets.                                                         
               A list of players, whose contracts existed at the time that            
          Bowlen acquired his interest, was used to determine the value of            
          the player contracts.  During June 1984, the Broncos' general               
          manager contacted four individuals, including general managers              
          and/or individuals responsible for negotiating player contracts             

               4 The parties stipulated that the partnership had an                   
          adjusted basis in the player contracts on May 31, 1984, in the              
          amount of $6,328,656; however, an exhibit reflects an adjusted              
          basis of $6,510,555.  Respondent relied on the amount shown in              
          the exhibit on brief without objection by petitioner.  We use the           
          $6,510,555 amount for purposes of this opinion.                             




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011