- 47 - is a stay in effect. Our opinion here does not interfere with the exercise of the jurisdiction of the bankruptcy court. We need not and should not act to implement the bankruptcy court's order. We have no jurisdiction to decide whether Mrs. Pert's liability as a taxpayer or transferee has been discharged in bankruptcy. See Neilson v. Commissioner, 94 T.C. 1, 8-9 (1990). To reflect concessions and the foregoing, An appropriate Order will be issued and decisions will be entered under Rule 155.Page: Previous 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47
Last modified: May 25, 2011