- 47 -
is a stay in effect. Our opinion here does not interfere with
the exercise of the jurisdiction of the bankruptcy court.
We need not and should not act to implement the bankruptcy
court's order. We have no jurisdiction to decide whether Mrs.
Pert's liability as a taxpayer or transferee has been discharged
in bankruptcy. See Neilson v. Commissioner, 94 T.C. 1, 8-9
(1990).
To reflect concessions and the foregoing,
An appropriate
Order will be issued and
decisions will be
entered under Rule 155.
Page: Previous 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 Last modified: May 25, 2011