Glenyce R. Peterson - Page 24

                                       - 24 -                                         
          The couple did receive a divorce subsequent to 1991.  We find,              
          however, that such circumstance does not outweigh the significant           
          benefits petitioner received from the embezzled funds.                      
          Furthermore, petitioner has not established that any hardship she           
          would encounter as a result of incurring liability for the                  
          deficiencies attributable to the omission of the embezzled funds            
          from the 1990 or 1991 returns would make it inequitable to hold             
          her jointly liable for those deficiencies.                                  
               We find, therefore, that it would not be inequitable to hold           
          petitioner liable for the understatements attributable to the               
          funds embezzled by Mr. Peterson in taxable years 1990 and 1991.             
               Because petitioner has failed to satisfy all of the                    
          conjunctive factors set forth in section 6013(e)(1), we hold that           
          she does not qualify for "innocent spouse" relief and is                    
          therefore jointly and severally liable for the deficiencies in              
          tax, additions to tax, and penalties for 1990 and 1991.                     
               To reflect the foregoing,                                              
                                                  Decision will be                    
                                             entered under Rule 155.                  














Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  

Last modified: May 25, 2011