Robert P. Petrocine - Page 15

                                       - 15 -                                         
          remitted with the extension request.  Sec. 1.6081-4, Income Tax             
          Regs.  Taxpayers "properly estimate" the tax liability when a               
          bona fide and reasonable estimate of tax liability is made based            
          on information available at the time of the request for the                 
          extension.  Crocker v. Commissioner, 92 T.C. 899, 908 (1989).               
          Reliance on invalid extensions of time to file tax returns will             
          not generally constitute reasonable cause for taxpayers' failure            
          to timely file tax returns.  Id. at 913.                                    
               Because petitioner failed to properly estimate his Federal             
          income tax due for 1991, petitioner's request for extension of              
          time to file a 1991 Federal income tax return was invalid.                  
          Because petitioner's extension was invalid, petitioner's 1991               
          Federal income tax return was untimely filed, and petitioner has            
          not shown reasonable cause for his failure to properly estimate             
          his 1991 Federal income tax and therefore to timely file his 1991           
          Federal income tax return.  We sustain respondent's imposition of           
          the addition to tax for the late filing of petitioner's 1991                
          Federal income tax return.                                                  
               For 1991 and 1992, respondent imposed accuracy-related                 
          penalties equal to 20 percent of the portion of petitioner’s                
          underpayment in tax attributable to negligence (namely, with                
          respect to 1991, the disallowed $5,433 investment interest                  
          expense and petitioner’s failure to reflect on the return his               
          liability for the AMT; with respect to 1992, the disallowed                 






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011